Ever thought that we might be fundamentally missing something in our approach to physics?
Maybe its time to try something new such as applying category theory, of all things, to physics (of particular interest to me - the application of topos theory to the foundations of physics). I stumbled across this incipient branch of mathematical physics quite by accident while checking out the "Quantum Information Scientists of the World Unite" group on facebook.
I have yet to get to grips with this subject but it does look highly promising and very exciting. Especially when you consider that "Briefly put, a topos is a category whose structure is so rich that it is capable of modelling any situation which can even be discussed in mathematical terms." Chris Hillman "A Categorical Primer" (1997). Surly this must find great application in physics.
So far I have mostly looked at the work of Bob Coecke and Andreas Doering, you may want to look at their web site: Categories, Logic and Physics
if you are really interested and a bit lost (like me) see: quant-ph/0510032, quant-ph/0506132 and quant-ph/0703060, 62, 64 and 66
Thursday, December 20, 2007
Wednesday, December 19, 2007
Correspondence Principle
Just finished a paper on the "Correspondence principle and chaos for a macroscopic quantum device". The surprising feature here is that the application of a traditional expression of the correspondence principle is not possible. It needs to be rephrased to something along the lines of:
Consider \hbar fixed (it is) and scale the Hamiltonian so that when compared with the minimum area \hbar/2 in phase space:
Even then application of this statement is limited by circuit parameters.
I would welcome any observations or constructive criticisms on this result:
http://arxiv.org/abs/0712.3043
Consider \hbar fixed (it is) and scale the Hamiltonian so that when compared with the minimum area \hbar/2 in phase space:
- the relative motion of the expectation values of the observable become large and
- the state vector is localised.
Even then application of this statement is limited by circuit parameters.
I would welcome any observations or constructive criticisms on this result:
http://arxiv.org/abs/0712.3043
Saturday, December 15, 2007
Bad Puns
For me this is a first trial as a blogger. There seems to be a growing number of people using blogs to stimulate discussion in science. Time to see if it also works for me.
Why is it so hard to resist bad puns?
Ontoso(phi) from Ontosophy and phi from notation used in quantum mechanics (reflecting my interest in foundations of quantum mechanics).
Why is it so hard to resist bad puns?
Ontoso(phi) from Ontosophy and phi from notation used in quantum mechanics (reflecting my interest in foundations of quantum mechanics).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)